Teams and HR
Hear from the people who do not speak up.
In a room where names carry weight, the useful answer is usually the one nobody wants attributed to them. Anonymous questions and votes are the difference between a retro that surfaces a problem and one that confirms what leadership already believed.
Three formats teams keep coming back to
The anonymous retro
A word cloud on how the sprint felt, then open text on what to change. Nobody's name is on anything, so what you get is what people actually think rather than what is safe to say.
The pulse check
A short form on a link, run every month. Conditional logic keeps it to a handful of questions per person, which is the only reason people finish it twice.
All hands Q&A
Questions submitted and upvoted in advance and during. Leadership answers what the company most wanted asked, in the company's own ranking.
Live or async, depending on the room
Distributed teams answer on their own time
A form collects over days, so nobody has to be awake at the same hour as the person who scheduled it. The same questions work either way.
A live session for the moment it matters
When everyone is already in the meeting, a live activity gets a response rate a form never will. Both surfaces share question types, so you are not rebuilding.
An AI read on the mood
Oratora watches sentiment as answers land and gives a plain language readout, plus a one click summary of the whole session or form when it closes.
Everything exports
Responses go to CSV, and sessions roll up into a report. Useful when a pattern needs showing to someone who was not in the room.
Questions people ops teams ask
Is it genuinely anonymous?
Can we run it in Teams?
Do employees need to sign up?
Can we use our own branding?
How does pricing work for a one off all hands?
Run your next retro on it.
Start free for a small team, or use a Day Pass for a company wide all hands.